Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2019-12-04 | 2020-02-14 |
| 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| Plastic | Aluminum |
| $ 350.00 | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip has an overall score of 88.5, which is better than Motorola One Hyper's global score of 79.8. The Galaxy Z Flip construction is a little bit lighter and thinner than the Motorola One Hyper, although both were only released with a couple months difference. Both of these devices use Android operating system, but the Galaxy Z Flip has newer 12 version and Motorola One Hyper has Android 11 version, so it provides a couple nice extra features.
Galaxy Z Flip has a little better hardware performance than Motorola One Hyper, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Z Flip also has more RAM memory. Galaxy Z Flip has a slightly better looking screen than Motorola One Hyper, because it has a quite bigger display, a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2636px and a just a bit greater display density.
Motorola One Hyper counts with a better storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that supports up to 1000 GB. The Motorola One Hyper features a much better camera than Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has a tinier aperture and lower 30 fps video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Motorola One Hyper also counts with a back-facing camera with way more megapixels.
The Motorola One Hyper has improved battery life than Galaxy Z Flip, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Although Samsung Galaxy Z Flip is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Motorola One Hyper, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Motorola One Hyper. If you are trying to save some dollars, you can buy Motorola One Hyper, giving up a few features and specifications, but you'll get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.