Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 85.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2019-12-04 | 2021-08-11 |
| 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.54 x 2.84 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid | Cream, Lavender and Phantom Black |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| $ 350.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.44 | 7.92 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip 3 has a general score of 85.6, which is slightly better than the Motorola One Hyper's general score of 79.8. Both devices in this comparison work with the same Android 11 OS. The Galaxy Z Flip 3 is a newer phone, and it is also much thinner and a little bit lighter than Motorola One Hyper.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 counts with just a bit better display than Motorola One Hyper, because it has a little bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2636, a little bit better amount of pixels in each screen inch and a little bigger screen. Galaxy Z Flip 3 has a bit faster processing unit than Motorola One Hyper, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Z Flip 3 also has more RAM.
Motorola One Hyper has a lot bigger memory to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Motorola One Hyper also has a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 1000 GB. The Motorola One Hyper counts with longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, because it has a 21 percent larger battery size.
Motorola One Hyper counts with a lot better camera than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not good for shooting photos or video in poorly lited environments, it also counts with a much more MP back camera.
Although Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 is a better device, it costs a lot more than Motorola One Hyper, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Motorola One Hyper. So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, otherwise you can save a couple dollars and get the Motorola One Hyper, letting go some specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.