Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-12-04 | 2020-08-07 |
| 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| Plastic | Aluminum |
| $ 350.00 | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G is better than Motorola One Hyper, with a overall score of 92.3 against 79.8. These devices have the same Android 11 OS, so you shouldn't perceive any difference regarding that. Galaxy Z Flip 5G is a just a little bit lighter and somewhat thinner cellphone than Motorola One Hyper, although both of them were released only 8 months apart.
Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a bit more vivid display than Motorola One Hyper, because it has a little greater screen density, a slightly higher 1080 x 2636px resolution and a little bit bigger screen. Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a bit more powerful processing unit than Motorola One Hyper, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has more RAM memory.
The Motorola One Hyper features a much better camera than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has worse 30 fps video frame rate and a smaller camera aperture which is not recommended for taking images and video in low-light environments, and they both have the same (4K) video definition, the Motorola One Hyper also counts with a much more mega-pixels camera.
Motorola One Hyper features a greater memory to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has only 128 GB internal storage, it also counts with an external SD slot that supports up to 1000 GB. The Motorola One Hyper has longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has a 21 percent greater battery size.
Galaxy Z Flip 5G costs a lot more money than Motorola One Hyper, but you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.