Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-12-04 | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| $ 350.00 | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a global score of 94.6, which is much better than Motorola One Hyper's 79.8 general score. Galaxy Z Fold 2's design is newer and noticeably thinner than the Motorola One Hyper's, although it is also notably heavier. These phones use the same Android 11 OS. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a bit better processing unit than Motorola One Hyper, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has 8 GB more RAM.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with just a bit better looking display than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has a little bit inferior pixel quantity per display inch, it also counts with a larger screen and a higher resolution of 1768 x 2208. Motorola One Hyper features a better storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that holds a maximum of 1000 GB.
The Motorola One Hyper has a little bit better camera than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has slower 30 fps video frame rate and a smaller aperture which is not favorable for shooting photos or video in low-light environments, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Motorola One Hyper also counts with a camera with a lot higher resolution.
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a little better battery duration than Motorola One Hyper, because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
Although Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Motorola One Hyper, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Motorola One Hyper. If you are trying to save some dollars, you can get the Motorola One Hyper, and give up a couple features, but you will get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.