Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 82.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Sony |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2019-12-04 | 2018-07-30 |
| 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.22 x 3.15 x 0.47 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 8.32 ounces |
| Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 350.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3840 x 2160 pixels (4K) |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 396 pixels per inch | 760 pixels per inch |
| -- | 900 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 10.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3540mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium is a little bit better than the Motorola One Hyper, having an 82.2 score against 79.8. Despite being the best phone in this comparison, Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium's body is older, somewhat heavier and way thicker than the Motorola One Hyper. The Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium has a bit faster processor than Motorola One Hyper, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium also has a greater amount of RAM.
Xperia XZ2 Premium features a much more vibrant screen than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a much better resolution of 2160 x 3840 pixels and a lot better pixels count per inch in the display. The Motorola One Hyper counts with a lot bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Xperia XZ2 Premium, because it has an external memory slot that holds up to 1000 GB and 128 GB internal storage.
Motorola One Hyper features a bit better battery performance than Xperia XZ2 Premium, because it has a 4000mAh battery size instead of 3540mAh. The Motorola One Hyper has a slightly better camera than Xperia XZ2 Premium, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not favorable for taking pictures in low light environments, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Motorola One Hyper also counts with a lot more mega-pixels back facing camera.
Although Xperia XZ2 Premium is a better device, it costs a lot more than Motorola One Hyper, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Motorola One Hyper. If you prefer to save some money, you can buy Motorola One Hyper, giving up a few features and specifications, but you will get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.