Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 77.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Sony |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2019-12-04 | 2017-04-05 |
| 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 5.75 x 2.83 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 5.68 ounces |
| Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid | Black, Blue and Silver |
| Plastic | Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 350.00 | $ 700.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 396 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 8.88 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (960 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.44 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 2900mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola One Hyper is a bit better than the Xperia XZs, having a overall score of 79.8 against 77.2. Even though the Motorola One Hyper is notably newer than Xperia XZs, it is heavier and a little bit thicker. Motorola One Hyper counts with a bit better performance than Xperia XZs, and although they both have the same RAM memory amount, the Motorola One Hyper also has a greater number of cores (although slower).
The Sony Xperia XZs has a little bit better display than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has a much smaller display and a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 1920px, it also counts with a little more pixels per inch of screen. Xperia XZs takes better videos and photos than Motorola One Hyper, although it has a tinier aperture, a lower (4K) video quality and a camera with much less mega-pixels resolution.
Motorola One Hyper counts with a much greater memory to install applications and games than Sony Xperia XZs, because it has more internal storage capacity and a slot for an SD memory card that holds a maximum of 1000 GB. Motorola One Hyper features a much longer battery duration than Sony Xperia XZs, because it has a 38 percent more battery size.
Motorola One Hyper is not only the best phones in our current comparison, but it's also a bargain compared to the other phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.