Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2019-12-04 | 2021-04-20 |
| 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.46 x 2.87 x 0.36 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid | Marine Blue and Moondust Gray |
| Plastic | Glass |
| $ 350.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 18.62 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola One Hyper is just a bit better than the TCL 20 Pro 5G, having a 79.8 score against 76.1. Motorola One Hyper's design is a bit thinner than the TCL 20 Pro 5G, but it is a bit heavier and was released around 17 months before. Both devices in this review come with the same Android 11 OS (operating system), so they should count with identical OS features.
The TCL 20 Pro 5G features just a bit better processing power than Motorola One Hyper, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the TCL 20 Pro 5G also has more RAM. The TCL 20 Pro 5G and Motorola One Hyper count with quite similar screens, because although the TCL 20 Pro 5G has a just a little worse pixels density, it also counts with a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a little bigger display.
TCL 20 Pro 5G counts with a much better storage for games and applications than Motorola One Hyper, because it has a slot for external memory cards that admits a maximum of 1 TB and more internal storage capacity. TCL 20 Pro 5G counts with just a bit better camera than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has a worse 3840x2160 video definition and a back camera with a way worse resolution, it also counts with a bigger diafragm aperture to take better images in poorly lited situations.
TCL 20 Pro 5G has a little longer battery lifetime than Motorola One Hyper, because it has a 13 percent more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.