Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 80.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2019-12-04 | 2018-04-20 |
| 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.36 x 2.97 x 0.36 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid | Black, Blue and Gray |
| Plastic | -- |
| $ 350.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 396 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| -- | 550 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Black Shark is a little bit better than the Motorola One Hyper, getting an 80.4 score against 79.8. Both phones in our current comparison work with Android operating system, but Xiaomi Black Shark has newer 9.0 Pie version and Motorola One Hyper has Android 11 version, so it provides you some additional features. The Xiaomi Black Shark is an older and a little thicker device than the Motorola One Hyper, but Xiaomi managed to build it just a little lighter anyway.
Xiaomi Black Shark counts with just a little better performance than Motorola One Hyper, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Xiaomi Black Shark also has more RAM memory. Xiaomi Black Shark counts with a bit more vivid screen than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has a little smaller display and a little lower resolution of 1080 x 2160, it also counts with a little higher display density.
The Motorola One Hyper captures much clearer photographs and videos than Xiaomi Black Shark, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is worse for shooting pictures or video in low light situations, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same video resolution, the Motorola One Hyper also counts with a back camera with a much better resolution.
The Motorola One Hyper features a much bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Xiaomi Black Shark, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage, the Motorola One Hyper also has a slot for an external memory card that supports up to 1000 GB. Xiaomi Black Shark and Motorola One Hyper have similar battery performance.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.