Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2019-12-04 | 2020-05-08 |
| 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.64 x 3.04 x 0.41 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid | Armor gray, Lightning black and Star silver |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| $ 350.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4720mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 has a general score of 86.6, which is a little bit better than the Motorola One Hyper's global score of 79.8. Although it's the best in this comparison review, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 is a just a bit heavier and somewhat thicker phone than the Motorola One Hyper. These devices work with Android OS (operating system), but the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 has the older 10 version while Motorola One Hyper has Android 11 version.
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 counts with a bit better performance than Motorola One Hyper, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 also has 4 GB more RAM memory. The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 features a little sharper display than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has a just a little lower pixel count in each inch of screen, it also counts with a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a little larger display.
Motorola One Hyper has a very superior storage to install applications and games than Xiaomi Black Shark 3, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Motorola One Hyper also has a slot for an external memory card that allows a maximum of 1000 GB. Xiaomi Black Shark 3 counts with just a bit better camera than Motorola One Hyper, and although they both have a back camera with a 64 mega-pixels and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 also has higher 60 fps video frame rate and a bigger aperture to take better images in poorly lited environments.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 features improved battery performance than Motorola One Hyper, because it has 4720mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.