Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 90.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2019-12-04 | 2020-05-08 |
| 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 7.00 x 3.28 x 0.40 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid | Blasting black |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| $ 350.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 7.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 484 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has a score of 90.1, which is better than Motorola One Hyper's general score of 79.8. Even being the best device in this review, Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro's body is a little heavier and somewhat thicker than Motorola One Hyper. These phones use Android OS (Operating System), but Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has an older 10 version while Motorola One Hyper has Android 11.
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro counts with a slightly better looking display than Motorola One Hyper, because it has a higher 1440 x 3120 resolution, a quite larger display and a quite higher pixel quantity in each screen inch. The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro features a little bit better performance than Motorola One Hyper, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro also has more RAM memory.
The Motorola One Hyper features a greater memory to install applications and games than Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a SD memory slot that supports up to 1000 GB. Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro features better battery performance than Motorola One Hyper, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has a slightly better camera than Motorola One Hyper, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same resolution camera, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro also has better video frame rates and a bigger aperture for better low-light images and videos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.