Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2019-12-04 | 2021-03-29 |
| 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.47 x 2.94 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 8.25 ounces |
| Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid | Ceramic Black and Ceramic White |
| Plastic | Ceramic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 350.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 516 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1700 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (1920 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 8.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra is much better than Motorola One Hyper, having a global score of 90.7 against 79.8. Both devices in this comparison review have the same Android 11 OS, so both of them should offer identical OS features. Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra's body is newer and just a little thinner than Motorola One Hyper's, although it's heavier.
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra features a much better screen than Motorola One Hyper, because it has a quite larger screen, a better amount of pixels per inch in the screen and a better resolution of 1440 x 3200. The Motorola One Hyper has a quite bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that allows a maximum of 1000 GB.
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra features a little bit better performance than Motorola One Hyper, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra also has 4 GB more RAM memory. Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra counts with a slightly better camera than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has a lot worse resolution back facing camera, and they both have the same diafragm aperture, the Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra also counts with a much better video definition.
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra has greater battery life than Motorola One Hyper, because it has a 25% bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.