Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2019-12-04 | 2018-04-03 |
| 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 5.94 x 2.95 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid | Black and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 350.00 | $ 639.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 396 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3400mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s is slightly better than the Motorola One Hyper, with a global score of 83.8 against 79.8. Although the Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s is older than Motorola One Hyper, it's construction is a little bit lighter and just a bit thinner. Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s counts with a bit sharper screen than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has a quite lower 1080 x 2160 pixels resolution and a little smaller display, it also counts with a just a little better pixel count in each inch of screen.
The Motorola One Hyper counts with a bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that supports up to 1000 GB. Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s features a little better processing power than Motorola One Hyper, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s also has more RAM.
Motorola One Hyper captures much better photographs and videos than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same video definition and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Motorola One Hyper also counts with a back facing camera with way more mega pixels.
Motorola One Hyper counts with superior battery life than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, because it has an 18% more battery size.
Although Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Motorola One Hyper, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Motorola One Hyper. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, but if you don't you can save some money and get the Motorola One Hyper, resigning a couple specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.