Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2019-12-04 | 2018-11-01 |
| 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.22 x 2.94 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 7.69 ounces |
| Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid | Black, Blue and Green |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| $ 350.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 has an overall score of 83.8, which is slightly better than the Motorola One Hyper's 79.8 score. The Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 construction is just a bit thinner than Motorola One Hyper, although it is a bit heavier and was released around a year before. The Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 counts with a little more vivid display than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, and they both have an equal resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, the Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 also counts with a little greater pixels density.
Motorola One Hyper has a quite bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Mi Mix 3, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that allows up to 1000 GB. The Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 has a bit superior CPU than Motorola One Hyper, and although they both have 8 cores, the Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 also has more RAM.
Motorola One Hyper has a superior camera than Xiaomi Mi Mix 3, because although it has slower 30 fps video frame rates and a tinier aperture, and they both have the same (4K) video definition, the Motorola One Hyper also counts with a camera with lot more mega pixels. Motorola One Hyper has improved battery life than Xiaomi Mi Mix 3, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity instead of 3200mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.