Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 82.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2019-12-04 | -- |
| 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.44 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.88 ounces |
| Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid | -- |
| Plastic | -- |
| $ 350.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 2080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 396 pixels per inch | 481 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 810 MT6833 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.44 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 has an overall score of 82.2, which is a little bit better than Motorola One Hyper's score of 79.8. Both phones we are comparing come with the same Android 11 operating system. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 design has the same thickness than the Motorola One Hyper, but it is just a little lighter.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 counts with a bit sharper screen than Motorola One Hyper, because it has a higher 2080 x 2400 resolution, a just a little more pixels per screen inch and a bit bigger display. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 features a bit better processing power than Motorola One Hyper, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 also has more RAM.
The Motorola One Hyper counts with a much better memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage, the Motorola One Hyper also has a SD card slot that holds up to 1000 GB. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 has superior battery lifetime than Motorola One Hyper, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
The Motorola One Hyper captures greater photographs and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11, because although it has a smaller aperture, it also counts with a camera with much more mega-pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.