Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2019-12-04 | 2020-05-05 |
| 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid | Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green |
| Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 350.00 | $ 291.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 396 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro is a bit better than Motorola One Hyper, having a global score of 81.1 against 79.8. Both phones in this comparison review include Android OS (operating system), but the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has the previous 10 version while Motorola One Hyper has Android 11. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro is a just a little bit heavier device than Motorola One Hyper, but both of them have the same thickness.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a bit better CPU than Motorola One Hyper, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also has 2 GB more RAM memory. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a display that is just as good as the display in Motorola One Hyper, because although the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a just a bit less pixels per inch in the screen, it also counts with a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a little larger display.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a slightly better camera than Motorola One Hyper. Both have the same (4K) video quality, a same resolution back camera, the same video frame rate and a F1.9 aperture. The Motorola One Hyper features a way bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because it has an external SD slot that holds up to 1000 GB and 64 GB more internal storage.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has better battery performance than Motorola One Hyper, because it has 5020mAh of battery capacity.
Even being the best phone in our comparison, Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro is also very cheap compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.