Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 79 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-12-04 | 2020-04-07 |
| 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid | Aurora blue, Glacier white and Interstellar grey |
| Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 350.00 | $ 249.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 396 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola One Hyper has a general score of 79.8, which is just a bit better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S's 79 overall score. Both of these phones work with the same Android 11 operating system. The Motorola One Hyper is a just a little lighter phone than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, but both of them have the same thickness.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S and Motorola One Hyper count with quite similar screens, because although the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has a just a little less pixels per screen inch, it also counts with a quite larger display and a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S counts with a bit more powerful processing unit than Motorola One Hyper. They have a Octa-Core CPU and 4 GB of RAM memory.
Motorola One Hyper features a way bigger storage capacity for apps and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, because it has a SD memory slot that holds up to 1000 GB and more internal memory capacity. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S counts with just a bit better camera than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has a back-facing camera with a lot worse resolution and a lower (4K) video quality, it also counts with a bigger aperture to capture better images and videos in poorly lited environments.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has greater battery lifetime than Motorola One Hyper, because it has a 26% bigger battery size.
Although Motorola One Hyper is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S. If you want to save some money, you can buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, giving up a couple features, but you will get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.