Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 76.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | ZTE |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-12-04 | 2020-02-07 |
| 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches | 6.27 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.17 ounces |
| Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid | Black, Ochre and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| $ 350.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 11.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 2560 x 1440 (Quad HD / 2K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.44 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola One Hyper has a score of 79.8, which is just a bit better than the ZTE Axon 10s Pro's 76.6 score. Despite being the best in this review, Motorola One Hyper is a somewhat thicker and heavier device than the ZTE Axon 10s Pro. These devices have Android OS (Operating System), but Motorola One Hyper has 11 version and ZTE Axon 10s Pro has Android 9.0 Pie.
ZTE Axon 10s Pro features a little sharper screen than Motorola One Hyper. They have the same pixels density, a screen of the same size and the same resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels. The ZTE Axon 10s Pro counts with as much memory capacity to store more games and applications as Motorola One Hyper, they have the same internal storage and a slot for an external memory card that holds a maximum of 1000 GB.
The ZTE Axon 10s Pro counts with a bit better performance than Motorola One Hyper, and although they both have the same number of cores, the ZTE Axon 10s Pro also has 2 GB more RAM. The Motorola One Hyper and the ZTE Axon 10s Pro feature quite similar battery performance. Motorola One Hyper shoots much better photos and videos than ZTE Axon 10s Pro, because although it has a tinier camera aperture, it also counts with a much better 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a back camera with much more mega-pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.