Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-10-12 | 2017-10-19 |
| 6.20 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 6.17 ounces |
| Space blue and Ultra violet | Black and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 152.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 271 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P70 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3520mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 2 XL is better than Motorola One Macro, having an 82.5 score against 73.8. Although the Google Pixel 2 XL is older than Motorola One Macro, it's design is thinner and a little lighter. The Google Pixel 2 XL features a little better processing power than Motorola One Macro. Both of them have the same number of cores and 4 GB of RAM memory.
Google Pixel 2 XL features a lot better screen than Motorola One Macro, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with much more pixels per screen inch and a lot better 1440 x 2880 resolution. Google Pixel 2 XL takes a little bit better pictures and videos than Motorola One Macro, because although it has a back facing camera with less megapixels resolution, it also counts with a much higher 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, a larger camera aperture for better photography and video in low light environments and a larger back-facing camera sensor which gives a better image and video quality.
Motorola One Macro features a quite bigger memory for apps and games than Google Pixel 2 XL, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that holds a maximum of 512 GB. Motorola One Macro counts with a bit better battery life than Google Pixel 2 XL, because it has a 14% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.