Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-10-12 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.20 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Space blue and Ultra violet | Black, Pink and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 271 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P70 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3 is slightly better than the Motorola One Macro, getting a score of 80 against 73.8. Despite of the fact that Google Pixel 3 is older than Motorola One Macro, it's body is noticeably lighter and thinner. The Google Pixel 3 has just a bit better performance than Motorola One Macro. Both have the same RAM amount and the same number of cores.
The Google Pixel 3 has a more vivid screen than Motorola One Macro, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a way better amount of pixels per display inch and a lot higher 1080 x 2160 pixels resolution. Google Pixel 3 takes a little bit better photographs and videos than Motorola One Macro, because although it has a less mega-pixels back camera, it also counts with a much higher (4K) video definition, a bigger camera aperture to capture better photos in low-light environments and a larger back camera sensor which provides a higher photo and video quality.
The Motorola One Macro has a much greater memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity, the Motorola One Macro also has a slot for an external memory card that supports a maximum of 512 GB. The Motorola One Macro features a much better battery performance than Google Pixel 3, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.