Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-10-12 | 2019-05-07 |
| 6.20 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 5.19 ounces |
| Space blue and Ultra violet | Black, Purple and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 186.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 271 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P70 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3a is a bit better than Motorola One Macro, with a 78.8 score against 73.8. Both of these devices include Android OS, but Google Pixel 3a has older 11 version while Motorola One Macro has Android 9.0 Pie. Google Pixel 3a's body is a little thinner and extremely lighter than the Motorola One Macro, although both of them were only released 5 months apart.
Google Pixel 3a has a much better display than Motorola One Macro, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a lot better 1080 x 2220 resolution and a much better pixels quantity per inch in the screen. The Motorola One Macro has a little bit better hardware performance than Google Pixel 3a. They have 8 cores and the same RAM amount.
The Motorola One Macro has a much greater memory for applications and games than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory, the Motorola One Macro also has a SD card slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB. Google Pixel 3a takes a bit better photos and videos than Motorola One Macro, because although it has a camera with less mega-pixels, it also counts with a larger sensor providing a better image quality, a bigger aperture and a way higher video resolution.
The Motorola One Macro features longer battery lifetime than Google Pixel 3a, because it has a 4000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.