Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-10-12 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.20 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Space blue and Ultra violet | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 271 pixels per inch | 443 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P70 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4 is better than Motorola One Macro, having a score of 81.9 against 73.8. Although the Google Pixel 4 and Motorola One Macro were released only a few months apart, the Google Pixel 4 is just a little thinner and lighter. Google Pixel 4 features a much better looking display than Motorola One Macro, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a much greater quantity of pixels per inch of display and a way better resolution of 1080 x 2280 pixels.
Google Pixel 4 features a bit more powerful processing unit than Motorola One Macro, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Google Pixel 4 also has 2 GB more RAM. Google Pixel 4 counts with a slightly better camera than Motorola One Macro, because although it has a camera with a lower 12.2 megapixels resolution, it also counts with a way better video quality, a larger back-facing camera sensor and a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better low light images.
The Motorola One Macro features a way bigger memory capacity for apps and games than Google Pixel 4, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal memory, the Motorola One Macro also has an external memory card slot that allows up to 512 GB. The Motorola One Macro has a much longer battery performance than Google Pixel 4, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 2800mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.