Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-10-12 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.20 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Space blue and Ultra violet | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 487.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 271 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P70 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4 XL is better than Motorola One Macro, with an 82.9 score against 73.8. Although Google Pixel 4 XL and the Motorola One Macro were released only a couple months apart, Google Pixel 4 XL's design is just a little bit heavier but a little bit thinner. The Google Pixel 4 XL counts with a much more vibrant screen than Motorola One Macro, because it has a much higher resolution of 1440 x 3040 pixels, a lot greater amount of pixels per inch in the display and a quite larger screen.
The Google Pixel 4 XL counts with a bit faster CPU than Motorola One Macro, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Google Pixel 4 XL also has 2 GB more RAM memory. Google Pixel 4 XL has a bit better camera than Motorola One Macro, because although it has a less megapixels resolution back camera, it also counts with a larger camera aperture, a lot better 3840x2160 video resolution and a bigger sensor shooting higher quality photos and videos.
Motorola One Macro has a much greater memory capacity to install games and applications than Google Pixel 4 XL, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal storage capacity, the Motorola One Macro also has an external memory slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB. Motorola One Macro has a bit better battery duration than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 3700mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.