Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-10-12 | 2020-08-20 |
| 6.20 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Space blue and Ultra violet | Just black |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 349.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 271 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P70 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4a is much better than Motorola One Macro, getting an 82.9 score against 73.8. Google Pixel 4a's construction is newer, just a bit thinner and incredibly lighter than Motorola One Macro. Both phones in our current comparison have Android OS (operating system), but the Google Pixel 4a has older 11 version while Motorola One Macro has Android 9.0 Pie version.
Google Pixel 4a has just a little better hardware performance than Motorola One Macro, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Google Pixel 4a also has more RAM. The Google Pixel 4a features a more vivid display than Motorola One Macro, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a lot higher 1080 x 2340 resolution and a way greater pixels density.
Motorola One Macro features a quite bigger memory capacity to store more games and applications than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that holds up to 512 GB. Motorola One Macro has improved battery lifetime than Google Pixel 4a, because it has a 27% more battery capacity.
The Google Pixel 4a takes just a bit better photos and videos than Motorola One Macro, because although it has a back-facing camera with a lower resolution, it also counts with a bigger back camera sensor providing a higher image quality, a much better video quality and a larger diafragm aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.