Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2019-10-12 | 2020-11-19 |
| 6.20 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Space blue and Ultra violet | Clearly white and Just black |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 271 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P70 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3885mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4a 5G is much better than the Motorola One Macro, with a score of 87.5 against 73.8. The Google Pixel 4a 5G body is newer, a little thinner and a bit lighter than the Motorola One Macro. Both of these devices come with Android OS, but the Google Pixel 4a 5G has the previous 11 version while Motorola One Macro has Android 9.0 Pie.
Google Pixel 4a 5G features a little bit better performance than Motorola One Macro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Google Pixel 4a 5G also has 2 GB more RAM. Google Pixel 4a 5G features a more vivid screen than Motorola One Macro, and although they both have a display of the same size, the Google Pixel 4a 5G also has a much higher display density and a way better resolution of 1080 x 2340px.
The Google Pixel 4a 5G features a superior camera than Motorola One Macro, because although it has a lesser megapixels back facing camera, it also counts with a larger camera sensor which gives a better photo and video quality, a larger aperture to take better low light images and video and a way better 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution.
The Motorola One Macro counts with a greater memory for games and applications than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external SD slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB. Motorola One Macro has just a bit longer battery lifetime than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has a 3 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.