Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-10-12 | 2020-10-15 |
| 6.20 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 5.33 ounces |
| Space blue and Ultra violet | Just black and Sorta sage |
| -- | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 548.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 271 pixels per inch | 430 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P70 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4080mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 5 is way better than the Motorola One Macro, getting a general score of 89 against 73.8. The Google Pixel 5 is a newer phone, and it's also lighter and thinner than the Motorola One Macro. The Google Pixel 5 counts with a bit faster CPU than Motorola One Macro, and although they both have 8 cores, the Google Pixel 5 also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
Google Pixel 5 features a more vivid screen than Motorola One Macro, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a way better 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution and a way better screen pixel density. The Motorola One Macro has a greater storage for games and applications than Google Pixel 5, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that supports a maximum of 512 GB.
Google Pixel 5 has just a little better battery life than Motorola One Macro, because it has a 2 percent more battery capacity. Google Pixel 5 counts with a much better camera than Motorola One Macro, because although it has a lesser MP resolution back camera, it also counts with a way better 3840x2160 video definition, a bigger aperture for better photography and videos in low-light situations and a larger sensor shooting better quality videos and pictures.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.