Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-10-12 | 2018-06-08 |
| 6.20 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Space blue and Ultra violet | Black and Gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 271 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P70 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V35 ThinQ has an overall score of 81.3, which is much better than Motorola One Macro's 73.8 global score. Despite of the fact that the LG V35 ThinQ is older than the Motorola One Macro, it's construction is somewhat lighter and thinner. The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a way better looking display than Motorola One Macro, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a much higher 1440 x 2880 pixels resolution and a way higher amount of pixels per inch in the screen.
LG V35 ThinQ has a very superior storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola One Macro, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a SD memory slot that allows up to 1,95 TB. LG V35 ThinQ has just a bit better hardware performance than Motorola One Macro, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
The Motorola One Macro features longer battery duration than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3300mAh. The LG V35 ThinQ shoots a bit better pictures and videos than Motorola One Macro, because it has a lot higher (4K) video definition, a camera in the back with more mega-pixels, a larger aperture to take better captures in low-light environments and a larger camera sensor providing a better image quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.