Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 85.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Microsoft |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2019-10-12 | 2021-09-20 |
| 6.20 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 5.72 x 7.26 x 0.22 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 10.02 ounces |
| Space blue and Ultra violet | Glacier and Obsidian |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 540.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 8.3 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2688 x 1892 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 271 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P70 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 (5 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4449mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Microsoft Surface Duo 2 is much better than the Motorola One Macro, with an 85.3 score against 73.8. Both of these devices include Android OS (Operating System), but the Microsoft Surface Duo 2 has 11 version while Motorola One Macro has Android 9.0 Pie. The Microsoft Surface Duo 2 is a newer and way thinner device than Motorola One Macro, although it's a lot heavier.
The Microsoft Surface Duo 2 features a little bit better performance than Motorola One Macro, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Microsoft Surface Duo 2 also has a larger amount of RAM. Microsoft Surface Duo 2 features a way better display than Motorola One Macro, because it has a really larger screen, a much better resolution of 1892 x 2688 pixels and a greater pixels amount in each screen inch.
The Motorola One Macro features a bigger memory capacity for applications and games than Microsoft Surface Duo 2, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory slot that admits up to 512 GB. Microsoft Surface Duo 2 counts with just a little bit longer battery lifetime than Motorola One Macro, because it has a 4449mAh battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
The Microsoft Surface Duo 2 captures slightly better pictures and videos than Motorola One Macro, because although it has a lower 12 megapixels resolution camera, it also counts with a bigger aperture and a lot higher (4K) video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.