Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-10-12 | 2019-10-16 |
| 6.20 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| Space blue and Ultra violet | Cyber shade |
| -- | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 600.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 271 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P70 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Nubia Red Magic 3S is a little bit better than Motorola One Macro, with a general score of 75.8 against 73.8. Both devices in this review include the same Android 9.0 Pie OS (Operating System), so they should provide the same OS features. The nubia Red Magic 3S design is heavier and a little bit thicker than the Motorola One Macro.
The nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a more vivid screen than Motorola One Macro, because it has a way higher resolution of 1080 x 2340px, a higher pixel quantity in each inch of screen and a bit bigger screen. Nubia Red Magic 3S has more memory capacity for applications and games than Motorola One Macro, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with more internal memory.
Nubia Red Magic 3S has a little faster CPU than Motorola One Macro, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has more RAM memory. Nubia Red Magic 3S features a greater camera than Motorola One Macro, because it has a much better 7680x4320 video quality, a bigger diafragm aperture to take better low light images, a lot better resolution back facing camera and a way larger camera sensor taking much higher quality videos and photographs.
Nubia Red Magic 3S has superior battery duration than Motorola One Macro, because it has a 5000mAh battery size instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.