Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 76.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2019-10-12 | 2020-09-02 |
| 6.20 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 6.64 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Space blue and Ultra violet | Sonic silver |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 579.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 271 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P70 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The nubia Red Magic 5S has an overall score of 76.2, which is just a bit better than the Motorola One Macro's general score of 73.8. Both of these phones use Android operating system, but the nubia Red Magic 5S has 10 version while Motorola One Macro has Android 9.0 Pie version. The nubia Red Magic 5S body is newer than Motorola One Macro's, although it is just a little bit thicker and somewhat heavier.
Nubia Red Magic 5S counts with just a bit better processing power than Motorola One Macro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the nubia Red Magic 5S also has 4 GB more RAM memory. Nubia Red Magic 5S features a sharper display than Motorola One Macro, because it has a bit larger screen, a higher number of pixels per screen inch and a lot better 1080 x 2340 resolution.
Nubia Red Magic 5S takes greater pictures and videos than Motorola One Macro, because it has a larger aperture to take better photos in low-light environments, a much larger sensor providing a way better image quality, a back-facing camera with a way higher 64 MP resolution and a lot better video definition.
Motorola One Macro has a quite bigger storage capacity for games and applications than nubia Red Magic 5S, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that holds up to 512 GB. Nubia Red Magic 5S features just a bit longer battery lifetime than Motorola One Macro, because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.