Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-10-12 | 2019-12-27 |
| 6.20 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Space blue and Ultra violet | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 282.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 271 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P70 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A51 is much better than the Motorola One Macro, with a score of 85.5 against 73.8. The Samsung Galaxy A51 design is a little bit lighter and thinner than the Motorola One Macro, although both of them were released only 3 months apart. Both phones we are comparing include Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy A51 has older 11 version and Motorola One Macro has Android 9.0 Pie version.
Samsung Galaxy A51 has a more vivid display than Motorola One Macro, because it has a lot higher 1080 x 2400 resolution, more pixels per inch in the display and a bit bigger screen. The Galaxy A51 counts with just a bit better processing power than Motorola One Macro. Both of them have 8 cores and a 4 GB RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy A51 features a superior memory to install applications and games than Motorola One Macro, and although they both have a SD extension slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB, the Samsung Galaxy A51 also has more internal memory capacity. Galaxy A51 captures greater pictures and videos than Motorola One Macro, and although they both have a same size diafragm aperture, the Galaxy A51 also has a way bigger camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors, a lot better 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a way better 48 MP resolution camera in the back.
The Samsung Galaxy A51 has a battery life that's just as good as the battery performance in Motorola One Macro.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.