Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-10-12 | 2020-04-29 |
| 6.20 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Space blue and Ultra violet | Prism cube black |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 271 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P70 chipset | Samsung Exynos 980 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Mali-G76 MP5 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A51 5G is a lot better than the Motorola One Macro, getting a 90.8 score against 73.8. Both of these devices have Android operating system, but Galaxy A51 5G has the previous 11 version while Motorola One Macro has Android 9.0 Pie. Even though the Galaxy A51 5G and the Motorola One Macro were only released with a few months difference, the Galaxy A51 5G design is just a bit heavier but a little thinner than the Motorola One Macro.
The Galaxy A51 5G features a bit better CPU than Motorola One Macro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy A51 5G also has more RAM memory. Galaxy A51 5G has a brighter screen than Motorola One Macro, because it has a bit bigger display, a greater screen pixels density and a much higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels.
Galaxy A51 5G features much more memory to install applications and games than Motorola One Macro, because it has an external memory card slot that holds up to 1000 GB and 128 GB internal storage. The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G counts with a way better camera than Motorola One Macro, and although they both have a same size camera aperture, the Samsung Galaxy A51 5G also has a camera with a much better 48 mega pixels resolution, a way better 3840x2160 video resolution and a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor taking way better quality videos and pictures.
Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has just a bit better battery performance than Motorola One Macro, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.