Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-10-12 | 2018-05-22 |
| 6.20 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 5.90 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Space blue and Ultra violet | Black, Blue, Gold and Lavender |
| -- | Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 109.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 1480 x 720 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 271 pixels per inch | 294 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P70 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Mali-T830 MP1 GPU |
| 9.18 | 8.73 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 9.44 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.13 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A6 is a little bit better than Motorola One Macro, with a 75.8 score against 73.8. The Galaxy A6 is an older cellphone than Motorola One Macro, but Samsung managed to build it lighter and thinner anyway. Samsung Galaxy A6 features just a bit better display than Motorola One Macro, because although it has a quite smaller screen and a bit lower 720 x 1480 resolution, it also counts with a quite higher pixels density.
Motorola One Macro features a little bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A6, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Motorola One Macro also has a higher amount of RAM memory. The Galaxy A6 has just a bit better camera than Motorola One Macro, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same video definition, the Galaxy A6 also has a bigger back camera sensor shooting higher quality videos and photographs, a larger diafragm aperture for better images and videos in low-light environments and a camera with a higher resolution.
The Motorola One Macro has a very superior storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy A6, because it has a SD extension slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB and more internal memory capacity. The Motorola One Macro has longer battery lifetime than Galaxy A6, because it has a 33% greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.