Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 76.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-10-12 | 2019-04-26 |
| 6.20 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Space blue and Ultra violet | Black, Blue, Pink and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 271 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P70 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 3.52 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A70 is a bit better than Motorola One Macro, with a 76.9 score against 73.8. Both of these devices use Android OS, but Galaxy A70 has 10 version while Motorola One Macro has Android 9.0 Pie version. Even when the Galaxy A70 and Motorola One Macro were released only 6 months apart, the Galaxy A70 is somewhat thinner and just a bit lighter.
The Samsung Galaxy A70 and Motorola One Macro feature quite similar CPUs, and although the Samsung Galaxy A70 has 2 GB more RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor. Galaxy A70 features a sharper display than Motorola One Macro, because it has a quite bigger display, a way better 1080 x 2400px resolution and a better amount of pixels per display inch.
Motorola One Macro shoots a lot better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy A70, although it has a smaller camera aperture which is worse for low-light captures and video and a smaller sensor offering a lower image quality, they both have the same (Full HD) video definition and the same video frame rate.
The Galaxy A70 has a much greater memory capacity to store more games and applications than Motorola One Macro, and although they both have a slot for external memory cards that allows a maximum of 512 GB, the Galaxy A70 also has 128 GB internal storage. The Galaxy A70 features a bit longer battery lifetime than Motorola One Macro, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.