Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-10-12 | 2019-09-27 |
| 6.20 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 9.74 ounces |
| Space blue and Ultra violet | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| -- | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 271 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P70 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Fold is much better than the Motorola One Macro, getting a 97.6 score against 73.8. Even though Samsung Galaxy Fold and the Motorola One Macro were only released 1 months apart, the Samsung Galaxy Fold construction is notably heavier but incredibly thinner than the Motorola One Macro. Both phones we are comparing here include the same Android 9.0 Pie operating system, so both of them should provide identical OS features.
The Galaxy Fold counts with a bit faster processing unit than Motorola One Macro, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy Fold also has 8 GB more RAM. The Galaxy Fold has a brighter screen than Motorola One Macro, because it has a better pixel number per inch of screen, a bigger screen and a much better resolution of 1536 x 2152px.
Samsung Galaxy Fold features a very superior memory capacity to store more games and applications than Motorola One Macro, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 448 GB more internal storage capacity. The Samsung Galaxy Fold features a bit better battery performance than Motorola One Macro, because it has a 10 percent more battery size.
The Galaxy Fold counts with a much better camera than Motorola One Macro, because although it has a back camera with less mega pixels, it also counts with a much bigger camera aperture to capture better photography in low light environments, a much better video resolution and a bigger camera sensor which gives a higher photo and video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.