Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-10-12 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.20 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Space blue and Ultra violet | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 271 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P70 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 is a lot better than the Motorola One Macro, with a 90.8 score against 73.8. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 is a newer and a bit thinner phone than Motorola One Macro, although it's also just a little heavier. The Galaxy Note 20 has a sharper screen than Motorola One Macro, because it has a greater count of pixels per screen inch, a little bit larger screen and a much higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels.
The Motorola One Macro has a better memory for applications and games than Galaxy Note 20, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 counts with a little faster CPU than Motorola One Macro, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 also has more RAM memory.
The Galaxy Note 20 counts with a little better battery life than Motorola One Macro, because it has a 4300mAh battery capacity. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 captures much better photos and videos than Motorola One Macro, because although it has a less mega pixels resolution back facing camera, it also counts with a bigger diafragm aperture for better low-light images, a much bigger back camera sensor which offers a way higher image and video quality and a way higher 7680x4320 video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.