Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2019-10-12 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.20 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Space blue and Ultra violet | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 271 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P70 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a global score of 98.9, which is much better than the Motorola One Macro's general score of 73.8. These phones work with Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has older 13 version while Motorola One Macro has Android 9.0 Pie version. Even though Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is heavier than Motorola One Macro, it's just a little thinner and newer.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a bit better hardware performance than Motorola One Macro, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a larger amount of RAM memory. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a way better looking display than Motorola One Macro, because it has a lot higher count of pixels per screen inch, a little bit bigger display and a way higher 1440 x 3088px resolution.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra shoots much clearer photos and videos than Motorola One Macro, because it has a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better photos and videos in low-light environments, a lot better 7680x4320 video resolution, a much larger camera sensor capturing lot better quality photos and a much more MP camera.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a superior storage capacity for apps and games than Motorola One Macro, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that holds a maximum of 1000 GB and 64 GB more internal storage capacity. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features just a little better battery duration than Motorola One Macro, because it has a 13% larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.