Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 80.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-10-12 | 2017-07-07 |
| 6.20 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Space blue and Ultra violet | Black, Blue, Gold and Silver |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 611.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 271 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P70 chipset | Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Mali-T880 MP12 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.13 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note Fan Edition is slightly better than Motorola One Macro, getting a overall score of 80.4 against 73.8. Despite of the fact that Galaxy Note Fan Edition is much older than the Motorola One Macro, it's body is thinner and lighter. The Galaxy Note Fan Edition counts with a better looking screen than Motorola One Macro, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a lot better display pixel density and a much better 1440 x 2560px resolution.
Motorola One Macro has a slightly better memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, and although they both have equal internal memory, the Motorola One Macro also has an external memory slot that allows up to 512 GB. The Galaxy Note Fan Edition has a little better performance than Motorola One Macro. Both of them have a Octa-Core processing unit and 4 GB of RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition has a bit better camera than Motorola One Macro, because although it has a back camera with lesser mega-pixels resolution, it also counts with a larger sensor capturing higher quality videos and photographs, a much better (4K) video definition and a bigger camera aperture for better low-light images and videos.
The Motorola One Macro counts with superior battery life than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.