Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 86.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-10-12 | 2020-01-21 |
| 6.20 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 6.44 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Space blue and Ultra violet | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura red |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 271 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P70 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite is much better than the Motorola One Macro, getting an 86.2 score against 73.8. Even though the Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite and Motorola One Macro were released only a couple months apart, the Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite body is a little heavier but just a bit thinner than Motorola One Macro. These phones come with Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite has older 11 version and Motorola One Macro has Android 9.0 Pie.
Galaxy Note10 Lite features a brighter screen than Motorola One Macro, because it has a greater pixel number in each inch in the screen, a much better resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a bit bigger screen. Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite counts with a little better hardware performance than Motorola One Macro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite also has more RAM memory.
The Galaxy Note10 Lite counts with a better camera than Motorola One Macro, because although it has a back facing camera with a worse resolution, it also counts with a lot higher video resolution, a larger diafragm aperture to capture better images and videos in low light situations and a bigger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
The Galaxy Note10 Lite features a lot bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola One Macro, because it has 64 GB more internal memory and a SD memory slot that allows up to 1000 GB. The Galaxy Note10 Lite features a bit better battery life than Motorola One Macro, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.