Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 88.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-10-12 | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.20 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 5.90 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Space blue and Ultra violet | Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green and Prism white |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 281.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 271 pixels per inch | 551 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P70 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3400mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S10 has a score of 88.3, which is better than Motorola One Macro's 73.8 score. Both of these phones include Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy S10 has older 11 version and Motorola One Macro has Android 9.0 Pie version. The Samsung Galaxy S10 construction is somewhat lighter and thinner than Motorola One Macro, although both were released only 7 months apart.
Galaxy S10 counts with a bit superior CPU than Motorola One Macro, and although they both have 8 cores, the Galaxy S10 also has a larger amount of RAM. The Samsung Galaxy S10 counts with a much more vibrant display than Motorola One Macro, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a lot greater pixel amount per display inch and a lot higher resolution of 1440 x 3040.
Samsung Galaxy S10 has a much bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Motorola One Macro, and although they both have a slot for SD memory cards that holds a maximum of 512 GB, the Samsung Galaxy S10 also has 64 GB more internal storage capacity. Samsung Galaxy S10 shoots much better videos and photos than Motorola One Macro, because although it has a camera with a lower resolution, it also counts with a lot bigger aperture, a larger back camera sensor capturing higher quality photos and videos and a way higher 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution.
The Motorola One Macro has better battery performance than Galaxy S10, because it has a 4000mAh battery size against 3400mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.