Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 93.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-10-12 | 2019-05-16 |
| 6.20 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 6.40 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Space blue and Ultra violet | Crown silver, Majestic black and Royal gold |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 342.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 271 pixels per inch | 502 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P70 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S10 5G has a general score of 93.6, which is way better than Motorola One Macro's 73.8 global score. Even though the Galaxy S10 5G and the Motorola One Macro were released with only 5 months difference, the Galaxy S10 5G design is thinner but also just a little bit heavier. Both phones we compare here come with Android OS, but the Galaxy S10 5G has 11 version and Motorola One Macro has Android 9.0 Pie.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G has a way better screen than Motorola One Macro, because it has a bit larger screen, a much greater pixel quantity per inch in the display and a way better resolution of 1440 x 3040. Samsung Galaxy S10 5G counts with a bit better processing power than Motorola One Macro, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Samsung Galaxy S10 5G also has more RAM.
The Galaxy S10 5G has a better memory to store more games and applications than Motorola One Macro, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 192 GB more internal storage. The Galaxy S10 5G counts with a better camera than Motorola One Macro, because although it has a less mega pixels resolution back facing camera, it also counts with a lot better 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, a much bigger camera aperture and a bigger sensor shooting better quality videos and pictures.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G features a bit longer battery duration than Motorola One Macro, because it has a 13 percent more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.