Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 89.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2019-10-12 | 2022-01-11 |
| 6.20 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 6.13 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Space blue and Ultra violet | -- |
| -- | Metal and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 700.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 271 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P70 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 (5 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.13 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE has a global score of 89.1, which is a lot better than Motorola One Macro's global score of 73.8. Both phones we compare here use Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy S21 FE has the previous 11 version while Motorola One Macro has Android 9.0 Pie version. The Samsung Galaxy S21 FE design is newer, just a little bit lighter and thinner than the Motorola One Macro.
Galaxy S21 FE has just a little better processing power than Motorola One Macro, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy S21 FE also has a larger amount of RAM. Samsung Galaxy S21 FE counts with a better looking screen than Motorola One Macro, because it has a way better 1080 x 2340px resolution, more pixels per inch of display and a little bit bigger screen.
The Motorola One Macro counts with a quite bigger storage for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S21 FE, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with a SD memory slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB. Galaxy S21 FE counts with just a bit better camera than Motorola One Macro, because although it has a worse resolution back-facing camera, it also counts with a way better (4K) video definition and a bigger diafragm aperture to take better photography and videos in low-light environments.
The Galaxy S21 FE has a little longer battery duration than Motorola One Macro, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.