Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 82.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 14 |
| 2019-10-12 | -- |
| 6.20 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | -- |
| 6.56 ounces | -- |
| Space blue and Ultra violet | -- |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 271 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P70 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.18 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S25 has a general score of 82.6, which is much better than the Motorola One Macro's 73.8 overall score. Both of these phones have Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy S25 has older 14 version while Motorola One Macro has Android 9.0 Pie version. Samsung Galaxy S25 is a way lighter and noticeably thinner phone than the Motorola One Macro.
Galaxy S25 has a much more vibrant display than Motorola One Macro, and although they both have a screen with the same size, the Galaxy S25 also has a lot higher resolution of 1080 x 2340 and a much better pixels number per display inch. Motorola One Macro features a greater memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S25, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with an external memory card slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB.
The Motorola One Macro has a much more powerful processing unit than Samsung Galaxy S25, although it has 4 GB less RAM, they both have the same number of cores. The Galaxy S25 features a way better camera than Motorola One Macro, because it has a much bigger back camera sensor, a way higher 7680x4320 video quality, a bigger aperture and a back camera with a much better resolution.
Samsung Galaxy S25 counts with a battery life that is just as good as the battery lifetime in Motorola One Macro.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.