Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 4.4.2 |
| 2019-10-12 | 2014-06-23 |
| 6.20 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 5.67 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Space blue and Ultra violet | Blue and Red |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 271 pixels per inch | 432 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.2 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P70 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974-AC chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 6.72 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.13 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | SIM |
| 6.6 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 2800mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 390 hours standby time 21 hours talk time |
| 5.92 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport is just a bit better than Motorola One Macro, getting a general score of 77.8 against 73.8. These devices have Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport has the older 4.4.2 version while Motorola One Macro has Android 9.0 Pie. Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport's design has the same thickness than Motorola One Macro, but it is somewhat lighter.
Galaxy S5 Sport counts with a much better display than Motorola One Macro, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a better 1920 x 1080 pixels resolution and a way better amount of pixels per display inch. Motorola One Macro features a much bigger memory capacity for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has an external memory slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB and 64 GB internal storage capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport has a bit superior CPU than Motorola One Macro, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory and an inferior number of cores (but faster), it also counts with a graphics processing unit. The Galaxy S5 Sport takes just a bit better videos and photos than Motorola One Macro, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not so good for low light photos, it also counts with a bigger sensor which provides a better photo and video quality, a lot higher 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a more mega-pixels back camera.
Motorola One Macro has a much longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 2800mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.