Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-10-12 | 2017-08-11 |
| 6.20 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 5.99 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Space blue and Ultra violet | Gold and Gray |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 245.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 271 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P70 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S8 Active is much better than Motorola One Macro, getting an 81.9 score against 73.8. The Samsung Galaxy S8 Active design is incredibly older, heavier and somewhat thicker than the Motorola One Macro. Galaxy S8 Active counts with a much more vibrant screen than Motorola One Macro, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a way better resolution of 1440 x 2960px and a lot higher number of pixels per display inch.
The Samsung Galaxy S8 Active has a bit more powerful processing unit than Motorola One Macro. They have 8 cores and the same RAM memory amount. The Motorola One Macro has a bit bigger memory for apps and games than Galaxy S8 Active, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal memory, the Motorola One Macro also has a slot for SD memory cards that supports up to 512 GB.
The Galaxy S8 Active captures a bit better photos and videos than Motorola One Macro, because although it has a back facing camera with a worse resolution, it also counts with a larger back-facing camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors, a much higher 3840x2160 video quality and a larger aperture to capture better low-light photography and videos.
The Samsung Galaxy S8 Active's battery performance is very similar to Motorola One Macro's battery life.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.