Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-10-12 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.20 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Space blue and Ultra violet | Black |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 271 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P70 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy XCover Pro has an overall score of 81, which is a little bit better than the Motorola One Macro's 73.8 score. Galaxy XCover Pro is a somewhat thicker and somewhat heavier phone than Motorola One Macro. Both of these phones have Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy XCover Pro has the previous 11 version while Motorola One Macro has Android 9.0 Pie.
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro features a brighter screen than Motorola One Macro, because it has a much better 1080 x 2340px resolution, a bit larger display and a much greater count of pixels per inch of display. Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro counts with as much storage capacity for games and applications as Motorola One Macro, they have the same internal memory capacity and a SD card slot that holds up to 512 GB.
Galaxy XCover Pro features a bit superior CPU than Motorola One Macro. They have 8 cores and the same RAM memory amount. The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro shoots a bit better photos and videos than Motorola One Macro, because although it has a much tinier back-facing camera sensor providing a way worse image quality, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same video definition, the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro also counts with a larger aperture to take better low light captures and a back camera with lot more MP.
Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a bit superior battery duration than Motorola One Macro, because it has a 4050mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.