Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 90.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2019-10-12 | 2021-08-11 |
| 6.20 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 9.56 ounces |
| Space blue and Ultra violet | Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 271 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P70 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.13 | 7.7 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4400mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 is way better than Motorola One Macro, with a 90.6 score against 73.8. Although the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 is noticeably heavier than Motorola One Macro, it's noticeably thinner and also newer. Both devices in this review include Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 has an older 11 version while Motorola One Macro has Android 9.0 Pie version.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 counts with a brighter display than Motorola One Macro, because it has a larger screen, a way better 1768 x 2208 resolution and a greater pixel count in each inch of screen. Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a bit better processing power than Motorola One Macro, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy Z Fold 3 also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
Motorola One Macro captures much clearer pictures and videos than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a bigger camera aperture to take better low-light photos and video and a more mega-pixels camera. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 features a quite bigger storage for games and applications than Motorola One Macro, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity.
Galaxy Z Fold 3 counts with a bit longer battery duration than Motorola One Macro, because it has a 10 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.