Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 87.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Sony |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-10-12 | 2020-10-12 |
| 6.20 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 6.22 x 2.68 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Space blue and Ultra violet | Black, Blue and Grey |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 848.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 271 pixels per inch | 449 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P70 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.13 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Xperia 5 II is better than Motorola One Macro, having a score of 87.2 against 73.8. The Xperia 5 II is a newer device, and it's also somewhat thinner and lighter than the Motorola One Macro. The Sony Xperia 5 II features a bit better hardware performance than Motorola One Macro, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Sony Xperia 5 II also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
The Sony Xperia 5 II features a much better display than Motorola One Macro, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a lot better 1080 x 2520 resolution and a much better screen pixels density. The Xperia 5 II shoots much clearer photographs and videos than Motorola One Macro, because although it has a less mega pixels camera, it also counts with a larger diafragm aperture, a much larger sensor and a lot better 3840x2160 (4K) video definition.
Xperia 5 II counts with a much greater storage for applications and games than Motorola One Macro, because it has a SD card slot that supports a maximum of 1000 GB and 128 GB internal memory. Motorola One Macro and Xperia 5 II count with incredibly similar batteries performance.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.