Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 79 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Sony |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2019-10-12 | 2018-04-05 |
| 6.20 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 5.31 x 2.56 x 0.48 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Space blue and Ultra violet | 16 777 216 |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 271 pixels per inch | 483 pixels per inch |
| -- | 700 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P70 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 2870mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact is a little bit better than Motorola One Macro, having a 79 score against 73.8. These phones come with Android OS, but the Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact has an older 8.0 Oreo version and Motorola One Macro has Android 9.0 Pie version. Even though Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact is older and notably thicker than the Motorola One Macro, it's body is still a little lighter.
Xperia XZ2 Compact features a much more vibrant display than Motorola One Macro, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a way greater number of pixels per inch of display and a lot higher resolution of 1080 x 2160. Xperia XZ2 Compact has just a bit better processing power than Motorola One Macro. Both of them have the same RAM amount and a Octa-Core CPU.
Xperia XZ2 Compact counts with a much better camera than Motorola One Macro, and although they both have a same size aperture, the Xperia XZ2 Compact also has a back camera with a much higher 19 megapixels resolution, a lot higher 3840x2160 video quality and a lot larger back-facing camera sensor providing a way better image quality.
Motorola One Macro features a slightly bigger storage capacity to install games and applications than Xperia XZ2 Compact, and although they both have equal internal storage capacity, the Motorola One Macro also has an external memory slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB. The Motorola One Macro features a superior battery duration than Xperia XZ2 Compact, because it has a 4000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.