Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.7 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | -- |
| 2018-09-24 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.14 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Black | Black, Pink and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2246 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 509 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3 is a little bit better than Motorola One Power, having an 80 score against 75.7. The Google Pixel 3 is a much lighter and somewhat thinner cellphone than the Motorola One Power, although both were released only 1 months apart. Google Pixel 3 has a bit better looking display than Motorola One Power, because although it has a little bit smaller screen and a quite lower 1080 x 2160px resolution, it also counts with a little bit better quantity of pixels in each inch of screen.
Motorola One Power counts with a lot bigger memory to install games and applications than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal memory capacity, the Motorola One Power also has a SD memory slot that allows a maximum of 256 GB. The Google Pixel 3 counts with a bit more powerful processing unit than Motorola One Power. Both of them have 8 cpu cores and a 4 GB RAM.
Motorola One Power features a way better battery duration than Google Pixel 3, because it has a 72 percent larger battery size. Google Pixel 3's camera is very similar to the Motorola One Power one, and although the Google Pixel 3 has a worse 3840x2160 video quality and a back camera with way less mega-pixels resolution, they both have the same diafragm aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.