Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.7 | 78.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2018-09-24 | 2019-05-07 |
| 6.14 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches | 6.30 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Black | Black, Purple and White |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 167.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6 inches |
| 2246 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 509 GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3a XL is a bit better than the Motorola One Power, with a score of 78.9 against 75.7. Google Pixel 3a XL's body is a little bit thinner and somewhat lighter than the Motorola One Power, even though both were released only a couple months apart. These phones work with Android OS (operating system), but the Google Pixel 3a XL has 11 version while Motorola One Power has Android 10, giving you a couple additional features.
The Google Pixel 3a XL has a bit faster processing unit than Motorola One Power. They have 4 GB of RAM memory and a Octa-Core processing unit. Motorola One Power and Google Pixel 3a XL count with very similar screens, and although the Google Pixel 3a XL has a little lower 1080 x 2160 resolution and a little bit smaller screen, they both have a greater pixel quantity in each inch of display.
The Google Pixel 3a XL has a camera that's just as good as Motorola One Power's camera, and although the Google Pixel 3a XL has a camera with much less mega pixels resolution and a lower 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, they both have the same aperture. The Motorola One Power has a lot bigger storage to install applications and games than Google Pixel 3a XL, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the Motorola One Power also has a SD memory slot that admits up to 256 GB.
The Motorola One Power has improved battery duration than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 3700mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.